Isolated vs cross margin on Hyperliquid: which to use
Verified against Hyperliquid docs: Margining and Hyperliquid docs: Liquidations · by Hyperliquid Academy
The difference in one line each
Cross margin uses your whole account as collateral for every cross position. Maximum efficiency, and every position is connected to every other one.
Isolated margin allocates a specific amount of collateral to one position. That position can lose at most what you gave it, and nothing else in the account is exposed to it.
Strict isolated is isolated with margin removal disabled, so collateral cannot be pulled back out of the position.
What it changes in the liquidation formula
From the liquidation documentation, the term that differs between modes is the margin available:
margin_available (cross) = account_value - maintenance_margin_required
margin_available (isolated) = isolated_margin - maintenance_margin_required
That single substitution is the whole distinction, and it has a consequence people miss.
In cross margin, your liquidation price on one position moves when unrelated positions move. A winner elsewhere pushes it away; a loser pulls it closer. A trade you were not thinking about can liquidate the one you were.
In isolated margin, the liquidation price is fixed by the collateral you allocated. It does not move because of anything else you do.
The cross margin failure mode
The dangerous case is correlated positions. Three long positions in cross margin on assets that move together are not three trades, they are one trade with three names. When the correlation asserts itself, they draw down together and take the account’s collateral with them at the same moment.
When each is the right choice
Use isolated when you are learning, when you are trading something illiquid or unusually volatile, when you want the risk on a specific idea capped precisely, or when you are running several unrelated strategies and want them not to interfere.
Use cross when you are managing a book of positions deliberately, when you are running a hedge whose two legs should support each other, or when capital efficiency genuinely matters because your collateral is working hard.
Use strict isolated when you want to remove your own ability to rescue a losing position by starving another one. It is a commitment device, and for some people that is exactly the right tool.
The practical recommendation
Start isolated. Not because cross is bad, but because isolated makes the arithmetic legible: you allocated this much, the liquidation price is here, the worst case is that number and no more.
Move to cross when you can state, without looking, what your other open positions do to the liquidation price of the one you are about to open. Until then, cross margin is offering you efficiency in exchange for a risk you have not yet learned to see.
Frequently asked questions
Which margin mode is safer?
Isolated, in the specific sense that it caps the loss from one position to the margin you allocated to it. Cross is more capital-efficient but links every position's fate to the account.
What is strict isolated margin?
Isolated margin with the added restriction that margin cannot be removed from the position once allocated. It prevents you from pulling collateral out of a losing trade to fund another.
Can I switch modes with a position open?
Margin mode is set per market before you open a position. Plan it in advance rather than expecting to change it mid-trade.
Does cross margin have a lower liquidation price?
Further away, while the rest of your account is healthy, because the whole account backs the position. That reverses when other positions are losing, which is the risk people underestimate.
Sources
- Hyperliquid docs: Margininghyperliquid.gitbook.io
- Hyperliquid docs: Liquidationshyperliquid.gitbook.io
We link the primary source for every number on this page. If a figure here disagrees with the official documentation, the documentation is right and we want to know.